By: Michael M. Shapiro
With recent polls
showing more than half of the residents of
Granted, we do not live in an eye-for-an-eye society, but when it comes to particularly violent crimes, should the criminal be allowed to live his life when he has denied another theirs? A good case in point is that of Megan Kanka. Jesse Timmendequas, a repeat violent sex offender, kidnapped, raped and murdered 7-year-old Megan Kanka. The national outcry that this case caused resulted in the passage of Megan’s Law, an attempt to protect communities from sexual predators. With the abolishment of the death penalty, Mr. Timmendequas will now serve life in prison without any fear of execution.
Innocent Megan Kanka never lived to see her 8th birthday, yet murderers like Timmendequas will celebrate many more birthdays. Has justice been served? Granted, he is not a free man and prison life is no picnic, but does the punishment fit the crime? What kind of message is being sent when it would seem that the victim’s life is not valued as highly as the murderer’s?
What do you think about the abolition of the death penalty
in
Michael M. Shapiro, founder
of ShapTalk.com, is an attorney who resides in New Providence,